The Wolf of Wall Street vs. The Odyssey: Box Office & Theatrical Economics Faceoff
Quick Answer: At the global theatrical box office, The Wolf of Wall Street leads with a total worldwide gross of $406.9 Million, out-grossing The Odyssey ($298.1M) by a margin of $108.8 Million.

The Wolf of Wall Street
Biography / Comedy / Crime • Paramount Pictures

The Odyssey
Adventure / Drama / Fantasy • Universal Pictures
The Wolf of Wall Street vs. The Odyssey: Theatrical Economics, P&A Recoupment & Studio Return
In evaluating the commercial faceoff between The Wolf of Wall Street and The Odyssey, worldwide ticket receipts provide only the top-line baseline of cinematic profitability. The Wolf of Wall Street captured higher aggregate worldwide box office gross of $407 Million, establishing a $109 million gross advantage over The Odyssey's $298 Million.
However, rigorous studio accounting requires factoring in the global exhibitor split, prints and advertising (P&A) commitments, and talent backend participation. Applying the standard Hollywood blended 50% distributor rental take, The Wolf of Wall Street converted its theatrical receipts into approximately $203.4 million in studio rentals, providing the vital cash flow necessary to offset its $100M production budget and global marketing campaign.
From a pure capital efficiency standpoint, The Wolf of Wall Street achieved superior return on invested capital, delivering an impressive 4.07x recoupment multiple against its initial production budget, compared to 1.86x for The Odyssey. In critical evaluation, The Wolf of Wall Street leads the artistic consensus with a Certified Fresh score of 94%, demonstrating that commercial velocity and critical standing can align effectively in modern franchise distribution.
The Wolf of Wall Street generated $407 Million, outperforming by $109M.
The Wolf of Wall Street produced 4.07x budget multiple against production costs.
The Wolf of Wall Street holds 🍅 94%, leading the review consensus over The Odyssey's 90%.
The Wolf of Wall Street (Paramount Pictures) versus The Odyssey (Universal Pictures) across global theatrical and streaming windows.
Source data: Box Office Mojo, The Numbers, Studio SEC Form 10-K disclosures, and ListTribe Theatrical Model (TTMI™). Verified September 2026.
Theatrical Market Share & Studio Waterfall
TTMI™ Documented Theatrical Model • 50% Blended Exhibitor Share
The Wolf of Wall Street
Paramount PicturesThe Odyssey
Universal PicturesDetailed Comparison Matrix & Key Milestones
Source: ListTribe Research Intelligence| Financial Dimension | The Wolf of Wall Street | The Odyssey | Comparative Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $406.9M | $298.1M | The Wolf of Wall Street (+$108.8M higher) |
| Opening Weekend | $61.0M | $12.4M | The Wolf of Wall Street larger debut |
| Production Budget | $100M | $160M | The Wolf of Wall Street leaner cost basis |
| Est. Global P&A Marketing | $55M | $88M | Tentpole Distribution Scale |
| Est. Studio Net Cash Flow | +$48.5M | -$99.0M | The Wolf of Wall Street (+$147.4M margin) |
| TTMI™ Recoup Multiple | 4.07x | 1.86x | The Wolf of Wall Street higher capital velocity |
| Tomatometer Score | 🍅 94% | 🍅 90% | The Wolf of Wall Street holds critical acclaim |
| Studio & Distributor | Paramount Pictures | Universal Pictures | Studio Distribution System |