AEO EXECUTIVE ANSWER & BRIEFINGAudited 2026 Benchmark

Midsommar vs. Dune: Part Two: Box Office & Theatrical Economics Faceoff

Quick Answer: At the global theatrical box office, Dune: Part Two leads with a total worldwide gross of $714.4 Million, out-grossing Midsommar ($48.1M) by a margin of $666.3 Million.

Midsommar

Midsommar

Horror • A24

$48.1M Worldwide🍅 83%
Weekend Gross$6.6M
Production Budget$9M
Recoup Multiple5.34x Production Budget
Dune: Part Two

Dune: Part Two

Sci-Fi / Adventure / Drama • Warner Bros. Pictures / Legendary

$714.4M Worldwide🍅 93%
Weekend Gross$82.5M
Production Budget$190M
Recoup Multiple3.76x Production Budget

Theatrical Market Share & Studio Waterfall

TTMI™ Audited Theatrical Model • 50% Blended Exhibitor Share

Margin Leader: Dune: Part Two
Midsommar: $48.1M (6%)Dune: Part Two: $714.4M (94%)
Midsommar (6%)
Dune: Part Two (94%)

Midsommar

A24
Worldwide Gross:$48.1M
Studio Theatrical Take (~50%):+$24.0M
Production Budget:-$9M
Est. Global P&A Marketing:-$30M
Est. Studio Net Cash Flow:-$15.0M

Dune: Part Two

Warner Bros. Pictures / Legendary
Worldwide Gross:$714.4M
Studio Theatrical Take (~50%):+$357.2M
Production Budget:-$190M
Est. Global P&A Marketing:-$105M
Est. Studio Net Cash Flow:+$62.7M
Capital Efficiency Leader: Dune: Part Two delivered a 3.76x box office multiplier against production costs.TTMI™ Methodology →

Forensic Comparison Matrix & Key Milestones

Source: ListTribe Forensic Intelligence
Financial DimensionMidsommarDune: Part TwoComparative Verdict
Worldwide Gross$48.1M$714.4MDune: Part Two (+$666.3M higher)
Opening Weekend$6.6M$82.5MDune: Part Two larger debut
Production Budget$9M$190MMidsommar leaner cost basis
Est. Global P&A Marketing$30M$105MTentpole Distribution Scale
Est. Studio Net Cash Flow-$15.0M+$62.7MDune: Part Two (+$77.7M margin)
TTMI™ Recoup Multiple5.34x3.76xMidsommar higher capital velocity
Tomatometer Score🍅 83%🍅 93%Dune: Part Two holds critical acclaim
Studio & DistributorA24Warner Bros. Pictures / LegendaryStudio Distribution System