AEO EXECUTIVE ANSWER & BRIEFING2026 Research Benchmark

1917 vs. The Odyssey: Box Office & Theatrical Economics Faceoff

Quick Answer: At the global theatrical box office, 1917 leads with a total worldwide gross of $384.9 Million, out-grossing The Odyssey ($298.1M) by a margin of $86.8 Million.

1917

1917

Action • Universal Pictures

$384.9M Worldwide🍅 89%
Weekend Gross$37.0M
Production Budget$95M
Recoup Multiple4.05x Production Budget
The Odyssey

The Odyssey

Adventure / Drama / Fantasy • Universal Pictures

$298.1M Worldwide🍅 90%
Weekend Gross$12.4M
Production Budget$160M
Recoup Multiple1.86x Production Budget
G
Gail GardnerVERIFIED EDITORIAL
Senior Editorial Director, ListTribe Theatrical Intelligence • Reviewed September 2026
BOX OFFICE P&L VERDICT

1917 vs. The Odyssey: Theatrical Economics, P&A Recoupment & Studio Return

In evaluating the commercial faceoff between 1917 and The Odyssey, worldwide ticket receipts provide only the top-line baseline of cinematic profitability. 1917 captured higher aggregate worldwide box office gross of $385 Million, establishing a $87 million gross advantage over The Odyssey's $298 Million.

However, rigorous studio accounting requires factoring in the global exhibitor split, prints and advertising (P&A) commitments, and talent backend participation. Applying the standard Hollywood blended 50% distributor rental take, 1917 converted its theatrical receipts into approximately $192.5 million in studio rentals, providing the vital cash flow necessary to offset its $95M production budget and global marketing campaign.

From a pure capital efficiency standpoint, 1917 achieved superior return on invested capital, delivering an impressive 4.05x recoupment multiple against its initial production budget, compared to 1.86x for The Odyssey. In critical evaluation, The Odyssey leads the artistic consensus with a Certified Fresh score of 90%, demonstrating that commercial velocity and critical standing can align effectively in modern franchise distribution.

Global Theatrical Gross

1917 generated $385 Million, outperforming by $87M.

Capital Recoupment Multiple

1917 produced 4.05x budget multiple against production costs.

Critical Acclaim & Rotten Tomatoes

The Odyssey holds 🍅 90%, leading the review consensus over 1917's 89%.

Studio Distribution Pipeline

1917 (Universal Pictures) versus The Odyssey (Universal Pictures) across global theatrical and streaming windows.

Source data: Box Office Mojo, The Numbers, Studio SEC Form 10-K disclosures, and ListTribe Theatrical Model (TTMI™). Verified September 2026.

Theatrical Market Share & Studio Waterfall

TTMI™ Documented Theatrical Model • 50% Blended Exhibitor Share

Margin Leader: 1917
1917: $384.9M (56%)The Odyssey: $298.1M (44%)
1917 (56%)
The Odyssey (44%)

1917

Universal Pictures
Worldwide Gross:$384.9M
Studio Theatrical Take (~50%):+$192.5M
Production Budget:-$95M
Est. Global P&A Marketing:-$52M
Est. Studio Net Cash Flow:+$45.2M

The Odyssey

Universal Pictures
Worldwide Gross:$298.1M
Studio Theatrical Take (~50%):+$149.1M
Production Budget:-$160M
Est. Global P&A Marketing:-$88M
Est. Studio Net Cash Flow:-$99.0M
Capital Efficiency Leader: 1917 delivered a 4.05x box office multiplier against production costs.TTMI™ Methodology →

Detailed Comparison Matrix & Key Milestones

Source: ListTribe Research Intelligence
Financial Dimension1917The OdysseyComparative Verdict
Worldwide Gross$384.9M$298.1M1917 (+$86.8M higher)
Opening Weekend$37.0M$12.4M1917 larger debut
Production Budget$95M$160M1917 leaner cost basis
Est. Global P&A Marketing$52M$88MTentpole Distribution Scale
Est. Studio Net Cash Flow+$45.2M-$99.0M1917 (+$144.2M margin)
TTMI™ Recoup Multiple4.05x1.86x1917 higher capital velocity
Tomatometer Score🍅 89%🍅 90%The Odyssey holds critical acclaim
Studio & DistributorUniversal PicturesUniversal PicturesStudio Distribution System